Las Cruces Community Radio 101.5 FM
  • Home
  • Donate
  • Listen
    • Archives
  • Schedule
    • Programs
  • Underwrite
  • Merch
  • About Us
  • Events
  • Contact Us

Walt Rubel Commentary: City can’t demand advocates split costs

12/15/2022

 
I was 13 or 14 years old when I came to the realization that tennis is way cheaper than golf. So, I haven’t spent much time in golf clubhouses. But, I’m certainly aware that those connected to country clubs have a well-earned reputation for racism and sexism.

The Augusta National Golf Course, where the Masters is played every year, didn’t admit its first black member until 1990 and its first female member until 2012. And so, it’s not surprising that when Las Cruces had a country club, it had a similar history.
Now, some in our community want to use that ugly history against the building itself. That doesn’t seem right. It’s a structure; it’s incapable of discrimination. 

The local country club closed in 2011, and soon after became an embarrassment on Main Street, greeting newcomers to our city with untended weeds and unwatered, dead trees for far too long.

Developers are finally ready to make that property productive again. That will require removal of the clubhouse, which was designed in 1929 by Trost & Trost Architects and Engineers. A permit has been requested for the demolition.

Those who understand historical architecture better than I do say the building is rare and should be preserved. Mayor Ken Miyagishima has concocted an ill-conceived plan to save the building.

He estimates the total cost to be $290,000, and said the developers were willing to pay what they had budgeted for demolition, $40,000. His plan is for the city to split the remaining $250,000 with those advocating for the building’s preservation.

City officials can’t ask residents to get involved in local government and then charge them for the issues they advocate for. Would we expect those calling for clean energy to chip in every time the city buys a new electric bus?

At a time when the city budget is growing faster than backyard weeds following three straight days of rain (up by nearly $16 million this fiscal year), it seems petty to be quibbling over $125,000.

The larger question is what value does the building have, and what would the total costs be to not only move it but then maintain it. Then, there are the questions of where to put it and what to do with it. Could it become part of our museum system, or would it just end up being a burden?

It’s good that advocates have brought the planned demolition to the public’s attention and forced the city to consider its options. 

Having never been inside the building, it strikes me as being fairly ordinary looking from the outside. The fact that Trost didn’t design many clubhouses may increase the rarity of the building, but I’m not sure how much that matters to most folks.

City officials must always be aware that any historic structure lost can never be recovered. But that needs to be balanced against the need for new development.

If city officials decide the old clubhouse has value and can be put to use, they should pay the full costs for that to happen. If not, they should issue the demolition permit.  



Walter Rubel can be reached at [email protected].
Listen to the audio version

Comments are closed.

    Shows

    All
    All About Books
    Cafe Con Leche
    Commentaries
    Coronavirus Update
    Delving In
    Earth Matters
    Eye On Government
    Just Community
    Live From The Market
    Live True
    Local Vibes Live
    Mesilla Valley Sports Show
    Speak Up Las Cruces
    Special Broadcasts
    Take On Faith
    The Sunday Show
    Think Again
    This Week In Las Cruces

    Music Shows

    You can find a two-week archive of all of our music shows and nearly every other one of our shows by going to our Schedule page.

    Archives

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly